?

Log in

Satanic Community's Journal [entries|friends|calendar]
Satanic Community

[ website | Ascendancy ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

meat for the beast, baby [07 Jun 2006|11:44am]

abyssus
[ mood | amused ]

this modern tale of Daniel in the Lion's Den has a more realistic (and tragically hilarious, if shit like this makes one laugh...I laughed long and hard) outcome.

if I were a religious fellow, I'd justify the big guy's lack of intervention this time because at least Daniel wasn't being a cocky prick about the situation. he didn't jump in like an idiot and shout challenges, he got pitched in by pissy Romans.

I am not a religious fellow, however, and can therefore only shrug and say, "you stupid fucker!"

post comment

[28 Feb 2004|02:04pm]

laveystudent
[ mood | blah ]

I would really like to see this community rolling again, so I decided to post something.

People are always so bewildered that my main values as a Satanist consist of education, loyalty, protection of those that I love, and self respect to name a few. "How can that be?" They ask. "I thought that Satanists were only spiteful people who want to do harm to others." Think again. Real Satanists for the most part are very moral, ethical, and individuals of good strong character. Satan is a symbol of our strength. Education is supremely important. There should be no such thing as a stupid Satanist. This totally negates the purpose of Satanism. Open your eyes. Get educated. It is the only thing which separates you from the person next to you.

1 comment|post comment

[19 Jan 2004|03:36pm]

crims0ngh0st
[ mood | accomplished ]

So hi, I'm not exactly new, I'm 666Queen incarnate... just stopped by to say howdy, and give this community a breath of fresh air...

post comment

[09 Dec 2003|09:32am]

shiva68
Yeah, I'll stop by once in a while, and post if I have anything relevent to the topic.

I've been watching a lot of these journals go belly-up over the last year. Shame.
post comment

Lust Magazine [09 Dec 2003|12:02am]

shiva68
Thought this might be of interest to some. It is an adult-oriented (not porn) e-zine created by CoS members studying the realm of Human Sexuality.

http://www.sataniclust.com
2 comments|post comment

[13 Aug 2003|12:36am]

laveystudent
Does anyone remain?
3 comments|post comment

An attempt to ressurrect this community. [06 May 2003|08:34pm]

laveystudent
To be truly Satanic is to be free from established ideals. It is to not be influenced by ways of "how you are supposed to live" and it is to live how you feel that *you* should live. Children and animals are the embodiment of all that is truly Satanic. I say this because they know nothing except their own nature. They know only what they need.
If only we could continue to live this way ... untainted by ideals force fed to us by the Christian church as soon as we are old enough to absorb them. Children and animals exhibit true Satanist behavior naturally. They do not have a "god-complex". They have only their nature: their needs, and their desires. They are not born believing that a god exists ... *they have to learn it*. At a young age, children are *led* to believe by someone that they must spend their lives in servitude to a god. It is not true nature to believe in a god. It is learned.
Ave Satanas!
Hail Thyself!
5 comments|post comment

The Satanic Bible [03 Mar 2003|05:51pm]

laveystudent
[ mood | indescribable ]

The Satanic Bible is probably the single most important piece of literature that I have ever read. If you have not gotten your hands on it yet, I wholeheartedly recommend that you do. As I read it, I felt a sense of enlightenment. Anton Lavey basically took everything that I felt and put it into words.

You have to learn who you are and what you are capable of. Being a Satanist means being an individual. Being an individual means being free in your choices, your thoughts, and your true human nature. There is no god above yourself. You are your own god. Satanism is Man taking back the right to experience life. This life is here and now, and I'm going to live it here and now!

Hail Thyself.

I really don't know what the point of this post was ... but for some reason I felt inspired to write something.

1 comment|post comment

Hail ... [23 Feb 2003|08:51pm]

laveystudent
[ mood | anxious ]

Does anyone in here still remember who I am? I just thought I would ask, because I am finally back.

1 comment|post comment

The Satanicon [06 Feb 2003|04:34pm]

lucifera
[ mood | accomplished ]

Satanicon: The Book of Evil Author: Adrian Clavex. The Black Star Church. 1993. Manchester, NH.

This is an outstanding book interpreting modern Satanism clearly and supporting Anton LaVey’s philosophical views. As Clavex describes in this book, The Satanicon is “a treatise of Man’s Dark nature is a system of Evilution; a collection of philosophical and psychological devices of Darkness.” But let us take a deeper look into this book.
(for the rest of the review go to this link)
http://www.angelfire.com/ny3/Lucifera/volume6.html

other book reviews:
http://www.angelfire.com/ny3/Lucifera/darkbooks.html








"I am treated as evil by those who feel persecuted because they are
not allowed to force me to believe as they do."

Lucifera's Pandemonium
http://www.devili.sh/Lucifera

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lucifera

post comment

Many don't seems to know about the Satanic Panic of the 80's [04 Jan 2003|03:10pm]

lucifera
[ mood | calm ]

And I say to all of you keep this in mind, because history does repeat itself. There's always a "witchhunt" going on.


"Never attribute to Devil-worshipping conspiracies what opportunism, emotional instability, and religious bigotry are sufficient to explain." Shawn Carlson, Ph.D

Many in the social worker, therapist, conservative Christian and police communities experienced a "Satanic Panic," starting about 1980. They, and much of the rest of the public, believed that a widespread, underground, secret network of Satanic cults were kidnapping, sexually and physically abusing infants and children, murdering them, and sometimes even eating them. In the United States and Canada, the scare reached a peak in the early 1990's.
to read more check out this site:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sra_intro.htm

post comment

what are your thoughts on this? I think it's silly [08 Dec 2002|01:28pm]

lucifera
[ mood | awake ]

The Free Church Of Satan, a U.S. based organisation attempting to model itself on the famous Church Of Satan, recently announced plans to open a ‘theme park’ – provisionally called ‘Perdition’ - devoted to “Lucifer, black masses and heavy rock music.” In an article which appeared in the UK’s Sunday Times newspaper, it was reported that the group have identified “two provisional sites near San Francisco and Dallas for a 15-acre theme park”, and that they, “hope to win over local planners with promises of jobs and taxes.” However, the Church Of Satan, founded in the 60s by the notorious/visionary (delete where applicable) Anton La Vey, have condemned the plans as ludicrous, expressing concern that such an undertaking might cause unnecessary friction between their members and America’s majority Christian population.

4 comments|post comment

a little something that came up in the COS bulletin [04 Dec 2002|02:46pm]

lucifera
[ mood | busy ]

I missed this issue of the Village Voice otherwise I would have saved this letter:


The Georges Montalba Mystery

Magistra Blanche Barton, Anton LaVey’s biographer, responds to an article published in the Village Voice which doubts a connection between LaVey and Montalba.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Bosler,

I feel compelled to clear up a few misconceptions you have about Anton LaVey. When you wrote your article, “Satan’s Helper…” for the Village Voice a couple of weeks ago, you obviously had only limited information from a single, very unreliable, source (namely his disgruntled daughter, Zeena Schreck). As a journalist, I’m sure your calling is to seek the truth, not to blindly slander those who are no longer around to defend themselves. So, in case you write any further on the subject or know someone who is planning to, here are some facts to rebut Mrs. Schreck’s self-serving lies.Let’s take it from the top:

1) Anton LaVey doesn’t have a reputation for making claims that are untrue, except in Zeena Schreck’s mind. He had a varied and fascinating life. Some people who no longer live lives but only watch them on the big screen, on CNN or on the Internet have a hard time believing that imaginative, driven people used to actually do wild and unexpected things. In 1960, people didn’t have a hard time believing that the same man who once played oboe in the San Francisco Ballet Orchestra could also have been a circus roustabout and cage boy, or a runner for the early Vegas boys. He was standing right in front of them—he demonstrated his skills and shared his recollections. And the people that he had known in the circus, in the carnival, from his musical days and on the police force, were all hanging out together at his house by the beach, or in the notorious Victorian on California Street. They had lived varied lives and done some interesting things themselves, or they wouldn’t have been sitting there. But times, and people, have changed. And a vocal few, who are offended by Anton LaVey’s philosophy or jealous of his success do their best to undermine him any way they can, including “robbing” him of his memories, as he used to say. Sometimes those who are offended or threatened by Satanism are fed by the convenient lies of those who are emotionally and intellectually withered. Do you see how that might happen, Mr. Bosler?

2) There was no “divorce case” between Diane Hegarty and Anton LaVey—they were never married.

3) Diane “LaVey” was never a co-founder of the Church of Satan. She was never listed as such on any Church of Satan corporate papers. She was the acting High Priestess from 1966 to 1984, during the time of her relationship with Anton LaVey.

4) Anton LaVey did not “die destitute.” He made more money the last year of his life than he’d ever made before. He grossed well into the high five-figures in 1997. I should know; I lived with him for 13 years and it was up to me to prepare his accounts for his tax man. He was never a millionaire, but he always had plenty of money to buy whatever cars, keyboards, books and guns he wanted.

5) There were no “forged Church of Satan documents” claiming Anton LaVey died on Halloween. Dr. Giles Miller didn’t get around to issuing the official death certificate until November 4th, 1997. He’s the one who listed the date of Anton LaVey’s death as 10/31/97. No one from the Church of Satan had anything to do with it—we couldn’t have if we’d wanted to. It’s an official document, filed with the city. I don’t know why the attending physician listed Halloween as the Satanic High Priest’s date of death; I never even met Dr. Miller until the night before Mr. LaVey passed away. I simply took it as one more interesting grace note in LaVey’s fascinating legacy. But it is telling that Mrs. Schreck was so offended by it she had to file an amendment to her father’s death certificate to make sure that it didn’t go into the history books that way.

6) About the royalties for the Montalba recordings that weren’t listed in the court records of Diane’s 10-year legal rampage against Anton LaVey…. I don’t believe LaVey ever did get paid for the Montalba recordings. That’s why there were no royalties or rights listed. And besides, as you say, the records were originally pressed many decades ago, so any payment Anton LaVey might have received would have been a long time ago, and no longer pertinent.

7) “Howard Stanton Levey,” as Mrs. Schreck is so fond of calling her father (when she isn’t calling him her “unfather” among other more unprintable epithets) was far from being simply an “organ enthusiast.” He was a classically- trained, professional violinist, oboist, organist, calliopist (the only musician listed under calliope in the San Francisco union directory for at least one year…also the only one listed under “band organ” and “una-fon”). His parents saw he had musical talent when he plucked out a tune on a harp in a music store when he was five. They paid for violin lessons, but LaVey was more drawn to the piano and oboe. As a youth, he became the second chair oboist for the S.F. Ballet Orchestra. LaVey was hired to play the largest pipe organ west of Chicago—the huge Austin concert model in San Francisco’s Civic Auditorium. The people who hired him were so floored by his playing that LaVey eventually became the city organist, playing for San Francisco cultural events, games, and conventions. He was chosen to be the last person to play the grand organ in the San Francisco Fox Theater, which was, before the city dunderheads decided to tear it down, probably one of the more elaborate and opulent movie theaters ever built. Zeena’s mother, Diane, was there. They were dating at the time and Diane wanted to attend the gala farewell to the Fox. When she couldn’t get the night off, she quit. LaVey had a repertoire of thousands of songs committed to memory, and he practiced his compelling arrangements several hours each day on keyboards he painstakingly programmed. All this is to say, Anton LaVey was not just an “organ enthusiast.” Music defined his life and much of his philosophy.

8) The name issue is a big one for Zeena Schreck; only her psychiatrist could say why. I’ve seen Anton LaVey’s social security card and it says “Howard Anton LaVey”. I’ve also seen books from his childhood that are inscribed, in a child-like hand, “Anton Szandor LaVey.” His father spelled his last name “LeVey”; Anton’s uncle spelled his name “LaVey.” Their original family name was “Boehm,” which was changed to “LeVey” at Ellis Island when Anton’s grandfather came into this country from LeVey, France. LaVey’s birth name might have been “Howard Stanton LeVey” for all I know; I’ve never cared enough to actually send to Chicago for his birth certificate (but it matters so much to Zeena that she probably has). It should go without saying, of course, that if it’s good enough for Bernard Schwartz and Reginald Dwight and Norma Jean Mortenson and Thomas Mapother, IV (Tom Cruise’s original name), it doesn’t offend me that Anton Szandor LaVey altered his name to one more reflective of his personality and imagination. Parents can be supportive and loving, but shouldn’t be expected to be prescient. We don’t assume Tony Curtis or Elton John are any less sincere, talented or truthful regarding their past just because they changed their names. (I’m sure Mr. Dammit would agree.) Zeena seems to want to make some leap that if LaVey “lied” about his name, then he’s lied about his past and his writing and his philosophy. That simply is not true. I did the responsible and necessary research to support the facts of LaVey’s life when I wrote my biography of Anton LaVey. Beyond that, I was close enough to him for 13 years to run across many documents and people from his past that all reflect the extraordinary life he’s led. Why does the NAME bother Zeena? Perhaps Zeena and her neo-Nazi husband (who has also changed his name) are offended by the possibility that her own father’s original name (if it is truly “LeVey” on his birth certificate) might be read as “Levy”? As I say, only her psychiatrist knows for sure.

9) I won’t try to clear up any of your misconceptions about Satanists. Your personal feelings come through loud and clear in your description of us as an aggregate of disenfranchised, clueless, suburban youth. This wasn’t supposed to be an article about contemporary Satanism, so I wouldn’t have expected you to do even the most elementary reading on the topic, like The Satanic Bible. A quick peek at The Secret Life of a Satanist would have served you well, but it seems you either chose not to read it or ignored it because Mrs. Schreck no doubt said it was fluff. The accuracy and tone of your article suffers greatly as a result.

10) “He (LaVey) released two classical gothic albums”…. I don’t know what “classical gothic” music is, but I assure you Anton LaVey’s recordings are neither classical music nor Gothic music. Anyone picking them up expecting either of those broad types of music would be sorely disappointed. He has always favored, as I discussed extensively in the biography, what he best called “No Bullshit music.” As he said, he liked, “Straight renditions, not jazzed up or be-bopped; but augmented, supercharged, to bring out the real strengths of the piece.” That was true whether he was playing circus music or romantic popular ballads from the 30’s and 40’s. He was an advocate for evocative music and, though I’m sure it’s another thing he’ll never receive due credit for, he was one behind the 80’s “rediscovery” of the beautiful music and styles from the 1940’s and 1950’s. LaVey never claimed to be a “musician’s musician,” but as you rightly say, he was indisputably a captivating and unique organist.

11) Ah, Zeena Schreck—musician, actress, photographer, writer, ex-High Priestess extraordinaire…. Well, you’ve obviously had more recent contact with her than I have. Perhaps you’ve heard some of her music that convinced you of her qualifications as a musician. All I’ve heard are a bad rendition of “These Boots Are Made For Walkin’ ” and some tortured, pretentious recordings she’s done with her husband and their “Radio Werewolf” band. Writer? She wrote an introduction to her father’s book, The Satanic Witch, which the editor had to rewrite almost entirely and is replacing for the new edition. I haven’t seen anything else except a slanderous multi-page rage against her father (do you see a theme emerging in Mrs. Schreck’s life, Mr. Bosler?). Photographer? Actress? I haven’t seen evidence of either skills. She called herself “High Priestess” in a couple of interviews when she was promoting her father’s book in 1989. Her sister, Karla, has done the same thing. Zeena never actually helped in the day-to-day administration of the Church since she was in high school (if then) nor were either of them listed on any Church of Satan documents as “High Priestess.” I do agree that, at age three, she was the world’s first famous Satanic toddler. But as far as I can see of her accomplishments, it’s all been downhill from there.

12) Short version of the story: Zeena Schreck got mad at Daddy because he wouldn’t give her the Church of Satan. She asked for it, he said no. She stomped her feet, picked up her toys and fabricated reasons to hate him. She’s still doing it. Like so many celebrity kids, she’s built an identity for herself by painting her father as a lying, abusive, talentless, selfish S.O.B. That’s why she’s “dealt with an endless list of untruths from LaVey’s name to his Gypsy heritage….” She finds great joy and satisfaction in trying to discredit her father, and, by doing that, gains praise from all the wrong people, who have their own agendas which she’s feeding. She was more than willing, however, to acknowledge Anton LaVey as her father when it came time for the division of his assets after his death, even though she’d refused to speak to him for the last 7 years of his life, and gave herself credit for killing him with a “ritual curse.” I could bore you with a long list of negative adjectives describing Mrs. Schreck, such as ungrateful, short-sighted, self-absorbed, cruel to her father, her son and to most of us who have tried to extend friendship to her...but that’s subjective and unnecessary. Her motives should be transparent to a writer of your position. I’ll simply repeat the phrase I’m sure you’re familiar with but didn’t apply to your advantage in this case: “Always consider the source.”

Now that I’ve tried to clear away some of the dross, let’s get to the real point of your article. Was Georges Montalba really Anton LaVey? The answer is “yes”—part of him was. And the funny thing is (I hesitate to use the word “ironic” because of overuse, but that’s a word that fits here), it was Zeena herself who promoted the idea that Georges Montalba was her father. Zeena was living in Los Angeles in the late 80’s and she walked into a friend’s house (she had friends in those days, not just toadies)—the friend happened to be playing a Montalba record. She immediately recognized LaVey’s style of playing Danse Macabre and blurted, “That’s my father!” The orchestration and phrasing on that recording are unmistakably Anton LaVey. I’ve heard him play the precise percussion and voicing note for note at least 200 times. Other cuts on the “Fantasy in Pipe Organ and Percussion” album, as well as most of Montalba’s “Pipe Organ Favorites,” are clearly LaVey playing. Some of the songs are just as clearly not LaVey playing, and the styles are distinctly different. Zeena herself enthusiastically pointed out the obvious Montalba connection whenever she could...not Anton LaVey. LaVey probably never got a penny from the recordings. It’s likely he didn’t even know he was on them until someone brought the records to his attention. But I do know he was spending a lot of time in Los Angeles studios in the late 40’s and early 50’s—even in San Francisco in the early 1960’s when he was still playing the mighty Wurlitzer at the Lost Weekend cocktail lounge in the Bay Area, among others gigs. He was paid to accompany many giggling would-be singers who had sugar daddies who believed in their musical careers enough to finance a demo. LaVey was never shy about playing; it was a method of enchantment and communication for him. I can well imagine him gleefully carrying on with one terrific song after another into the wee hours of the morning with some sound engineers, who might not have even gotten his name. But when it came time to fill out a “Montalba” record that was running short, why not throw on some of that good stuff from that guy that was in here last month?

I don’t want to take away anything from Mr. Hunter, or his family. He was an accomplished musician with a remarkable past who deserves due credit for his lengthy career. It’s great when any organist gets this kind of attention in today’s synthesized society. I’m sure Mr. Dammit was thorough in his research and most likely did track down one of the “Montalba”s. But it’s clear from listening to the recordings that one man did not do them all. Just as the pulp magazines like Amazing Stories and Weird Tales used “house names” under which several different writers wrote stories, it seems there were at least two people recorded under the Montalba name. Pulp collectors take great delight in tracking down the names of the various writers who used a particular house name. There might be more musicians besides Mr. LaVey and Mr. Hunter that were the “real” Montalba. If I wanted to develop a list, I’d try to find the producers or sound engineers for Stereo-Fidelity Records, or the manufacturer of the Montalba “Fantasy” recording—Miller International Co. in Media, PA. Even if Stereo-Fidelity is no longer in existence, there would have to be court papers filed somewhere for the company, on which names would be included. I would think they would be much more reliable and objective sources than obviously envious, vindictive offspring. I can’t believe this is the first time you’ve encountered such people in your professional career. Do you usually give them such credence, or was Mrs. Schreck just feeding into your expectations so much you couldn’t resist using her as your primary source?

When all is said and done, I’m sure Mr. Dammit and yourself would admit that the recording of Danse Macabre that Mr. Dammit enjoyed so much isn’t suddenly less enjoyable just because you know it was recorded by the Devil’s Advocate. I love “Montalba” ’s distinctly wicked renditions and will be among the first to purchase them. As long as the recordings are being re-issued, they’ll be available to those who know the real story—whatever you choose to think the “real” story is. I guarantee that both you and Mr. Dammit, if you’d had the opportunity, would have enjoyed a much more invigorating and enlightening evening of music and jokes with Anton LaVey than you ever would suffering through an evening of strained bitterness with Zeena Schreck. LaVey was an authentic, deep-feeling man, as anyone who really listens to his music can immediately tell—his intensity shines through in every carefully-crafted chord. Would Mr. Dammit have been so eager to re-issue these gems if he thought they were recorded by the Black Pope? Perhaps not. The funniest thing is that, were he still alive, Anton LaVey might very well remember Robert Hunter, as he remembered so many musicians in those circles. He would probably have gotten a good chuckle from the whole convoluted tale, and be pleased that the recordings are gaining the appreciative audience they deserve.


Blanche Barton
San Diego, California
13 August, 2002 C.E.

1 comment|post comment

Satanic Wedding in NYC [03 Oct 2002|11:07pm]

lucifera
[ mood | contemplative ]

To find out more read my journal if you are interested in attending.
Lucifera's LJ

2 comments|post comment

Satanic Wedding in NYC [03 Oct 2002|11:05pm]

lucifera
[ mood | contemplative ]

To find out more read my journal if you are interested in attending.
Lucifera's LJ

post comment

Website for Satanic artists [31 Aug 2002|02:26pm]

shiva68
[ mood | accomplished ]

At long-last, my little online contribution to Satanism is available for viewing. Artistic Devil was created with two goals in mind:

1. To provide a venue for Satanic or occult-related artists to show off or sell their artwork.

2. To create a type of online "yellow pages" for these types of artists who provide services. (designers, commission artists, interior decorators, sculptures, etc..) I figured that if someone wants a baphomet mural on their walls or a custom-made ritual robe, they'd probably like to find someone to build it who wouldn't look at them funny.

The site is as http://www.artisticdevil.com

5 comments|post comment

all praise and hail the Weekly World News! [29 Jun 2002|12:18am]

abyssus
[ mood | amused ]

SATAN'S BEDROOM SLIPPERS FOUND!
A PAIR of tattered bedroom slippers designed to accomodate cloven-hoofed feet have been found by archaeologists excavating the ruins of a 15th-century Satanic monastery in Frankfurt, Germany.
Experts believe the footwear may be the fabled "Slippers of Satan," said to be worn by the Evil One when he relaxed during visits to his followers.
"Whoever wore these slippers was probably an overnight guest who left them behind inadvertantly,: says archaeologist Klaus Dermeister, whose team made the extraordinary find.

1 comment|post comment

Empty [18 Jun 2002|12:39am]

halo_ov_fire
Does anyone really even post here anymore?

Xeper and Remanifest!

~Aeron
post comment

[31 May 2002|02:12am]

666queen
[ mood | fiesty ]

muahahahaha

Hail Satan!

~licks and bites for anybody that happens to read this...~

;)

1 comment|post comment

as dieter stated, "score one for the Dark Lord of Badness"! [07 Feb 2002|06:48am]

abyssus
[ mood | sleepy ]

or, in this case, 2! Found this link on the Church of Satan news section.

Honolulu Advertiser.com :
Satanism ban lifted from high school


Neat!
1 comment|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]